Page 38 - michael-journal-2019-may
P. 38

The Social Dividend

                              Progress and Unemployment


        39. How do we deal with unemployment?                42. How can mechanization become an ally?
            If it were simply a matter of work we know that      This alliance would be created through the distri-
        anyone can dig a hole, fill it up, dig it again and fill it up   bution of a Social Dividend which would be a source
        once more. An unemployed person occupied in this     of purchasing power in addition to salaries. The Divi-
        manner would not make a single penny. Why focus      dend would enable the population to buy the abun-
        on work and jobs when it is money that is needed?    dant products available because of technological ad-
        The  solution does not lie with work; it lies with the   vances and progress.
        products that must be sold. An increase in the sales of   43. Would the Social Dividend be the source of an
        products could even give employment new life.            additional tax borne by those who work?
            The system ironically requires that work be done     The Social Dividend should not be confused with
        in order to have access to goods whose production    social programs such as welfare and employment in-
        requires the input of less work.                     surance. The funds used in the latter programs were
        40. We do not want mechanization to take away our    taken from the earnings of other members of society
            jobs.                                            through taxation.
            What? Is progress an  enemy  of mankind? Must        Social programs demoralize recipients by finan-
        we give up on education and all discoveries? Must we   cially penalizing  those who would work. A recipient
        close all universities and end research?             who accepts work, even at minimum wage, can lose
                                                             his benefits. Receiving benefits can be humiliating; the
            Progress must not be done away with; it must be   recipient is made to believe that he is living at the ex-
        applied to freeing mankind.                          pense of others.
        41. Could progress be a good thing?                      The Social Dividend  has none of these  negative
            Of course. The machine is worthwhile and a step   features. It is an income distributed to all since it be-
        in the right direction even if it replaces the work of 10   longs to everyone. It creates a burden for no one and
        men. This is an indicator of progress.               is not paid out of borrowed money nor from taxation;
                                                             neither is it inflationary as it is backed by goods and
            Progress frees us from working for material well-
        being  and  gives  us  more  time  for leisure.  Everyone   services. The Social Dividend is not charity. It is akin to
        must be able to purchase what progress makes pos-    the distribution of revenues to “shareholders”. Advan-
        sible. Progress should improve the quality of life and   ces in the processes that accelerate the volume of pro-
                                                             duction call for advancements in the amount of money
        liberate us from worries about the future.
                                                             that is available in society.
                                       Freedom and Dignity



        44. Why do we need a guaranteed income to ensure     legitimate but may seem superfluous.
            our freedom and dignity?                             In the scheme of life’s basic needs, all people are
            All people have freedom inscribed in their hearts,   equal. Thus we cannot approve of a social and eco-
        but if a person does not have the basics of life, free-  nomic system that allows some of its members to do
        dom is no more than a word.                          without the basics while others live in luxury. The “vital
            People will suffer all manner of humiliations if they   minimum” requires that each individual has available
        do not have access to basic goods. When people are   a minimum amount of purchasing power. This aim is
        guaranteed  their subsistence those with self-respect   achievable,  straightforward and  necessary with to-
        will accept privations and even renounce well-being   day’s methods of mechanized production.
        and comforts rather than lose their freedom. This is   46. Who is responsible for the provision to each per-
        why exploiters, in both politics and industry, react       son of a “vital minimum”?
        negatively as soon as the question arises whether so-    It is the duty of a well-organized society to ensure
        ciety should guarantee a “vital minimum” to each of   that each of its members be guaranteed at least the
        its members.                                         minimum amount required for living.
        45. What is meant by “vital minimum”?                    Economic security, i.e., having basic needs met,
            The  “vital  minimum” refers to the  least  amount   is one thing; an individual’s freedom of choice is an-
        of economic security required to meet basic needs.   other. To be real and effective, freedom requires one
        Some human needs are essential and if they are not   to have a minimum of economic security.
        satisfied life cannot proceed. Other needs are less es-  47. Wasn’t the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
        sential but are of great value to the quality of life and      [signed in 1948] created to serve that purpose?   u
        personal development. Still other needs are perfectly


        www.michaeljournal.org                                                MICHAEL  May/June/July 2019    41
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43