Page 39 - michael-journal-2019-may
P. 39

The Social Dividend

     u      Society proclaims the right to life, but has no legis-  ment  of other  citizens  since  subsidies are  financed
        lation enabling and enforcing this right.            through taxation. Social Dividends, however, treat the
            Civil societies do not appear concerned with the   lowest ranking citizen regally.
        well-being of each of their members. Even in countries   The basis of the Social Dividend is applied science
        where goods are plentiful, the allocation of money is   and progress placed at the service of each individual.
        not adjusted to the level necessary to satisfy human   The rationale is progress: the huge actual and poten-
        needs. Money is strictly used to gain financial profit.  tial production of a nation. Dividends will be issued in
            This shows contempt for the human person and a   the form of money.
        departure from the plan of God who is the Creator of     Under Social Credit there would be no financial
        all forms of wealth. Goods are intended for all men.  problem where there existed no problem of produc-
            48. How will societies guarantee this “vital min-  tion.  There  is no secret. Social  Credit ensures that
        imum”?                                               money reflect production rather than limit production.
            Some radical changes will have to be made: not       Today’s monetary system is used mainly to drive
        to the way we make goods, nor to the ownership of    individuals and governments into debt.
        the means of production, but rather to the financial     52. Could Social Dividends be the “vital  min-
        system.                                              imum” that would guarantee an individual’s freedom
            Douglas  developed  proposals that  offer a  mode   and dignity?
        of distribution that would place money at the service    Yes! This is where we can address the outstand-
        of physical realities. The implementation of these pro-  ing fact that the Social Dividend guarantees social se-
        posals, known as Social Credit, would guarantee that   curity. The Social Dividend is the only form of social
        all individuals receive their share of the huge amount   security that does not humiliate or impede. Accessing
        of modern production in a stable and sustainable way.   bread, with no condition other than that bread exists,
            Human beings would be recognized and treated     would free people. The first fruit of progress should
        as more important than money. The primacy of the hu-  be the guarantee that necessities are taken care of and
        man person would be recognized; a primacy claimed    that economic security for today and tomorrow is en-
        in principle, but that no government has thus far pro-  sured.
        tected in legislation.                                   A Social Dividend, to each and every person from
            49. Are wage subsidies a more efficient means    birth until  death,  would provide mankind with the
        than Social Dividends of securing income?            beautiful fruit that is derived from progress.
            Governments often grant or refuse to grant sub-
        sidies according to political factors. They set condi-
        tions and restrictions. Subsidy politics creates recipi-
        ents that have their hands tied and who are made to
        feel obligated to government.
            Social Dividend policy does the opposite. It ren-
        ders people free. By having money to pay for goods
        and services we need not turn to the government for
        aid. Free people can pay for their institutions and can,
        in turn, attain their personal goals.
            50. How do you respond to people who say that
        Social Dividends will lead to inflation?
            The same people who raise this false alarm do not
        worry that government subsidies will be inflationary. If
        resources and workers are available to establish sub-        Industrialist Henry Ford II once invited Wal-
        sidies why would they not be available to answer the    ter Reuther, then president of the Auto Workers
        need for Social Dividends?                              Union, to see the first automated robots in his
            51. Do  you  see  a  difference  between  subsidies   factory. Ford praised their efficiency and said
        and Social Dividends?                                   that it would be easy to replace workers in auto-
                                                                mobile production. Reuther wisely commented:
            The  results are quite  different.  Subsidies create   “How many of these robots will buy a car?” If
        recipients who have moral debts; the Social Dividend    money is not distributed directly to consum-
        leaves citizens free. Subsidies turn governments into   ers, who will buy the production that is made
        guardians while Social Dividends make governments       by machinery? If machinery  replaces  salaried
        the servants of the people.
                                                                workers, people will need a Dividend to replace
            The  politics of subsidies opens the  door to fa-   their lost income.
        vouring the “friends” of the government to the detri-


        42     MICHAEL  May/June/July 2019                                              www.michaeljournal.org
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44